What international agreements are affecting the work on climate change?

Published on:
December 11, 2023
Episode #:
2

Summary

Another video question from our friends at Missouri Green Banc, Aclymate CEO Mike Smith dives into the state of international climate agreements and what you need to know about them!

Transcript

0:00

Mike Smith: So I got another question from  

0:01

my friends at the Missouri Green Bank, and they  wanted to know, what is the state of international  

0:05

climate agreements and how are they affecting  climate action? Well, you might be hearing in  

0:10

the news about something known as COP 28 that's  happening right now in Dubai. COP's an acronym,  

0:15

it doesn't really matter what it stands for, but  the important thing to know is that COP meetings  

0:18

are big treaty conferences. where representatives  of every country on earth meet and over the past  

0:24

decade or so have been joined by a significant  number of business people, scientists, activists,  

0:30

and others, and they all come together to talk  about climate. A lot of climate deals happen here,  

0:35

both between governments, but also increasingly  between these other organizations too. The COP  

0:40

meetings are super important, with the most  famous being COP 21, and this is where the Paris  

0:45

Agreement was signed in 2016, and you guessed it,  the city of Paris. It was a non-binding agreement  

0:50

that set the maximum warming target to be 2  degrees Celsius over the industrial average with  

0:58

an actual target goal of 1.5 degrees maximum.  That comes out to be about 3.6 degrees and  

1:04

2.7 degrees Fahrenheit respectively. The science  had been really clear that certain environmental  

1:10

tipping points happened at these thresholds.  The Paris Agreement was the first time that  

1:15

the scientific... statements have been converted  into political goals. And this is really important  

1:21

because it introduced the pathway for emissions  reductions, for pollution reduction. Specifically,  

1:27

we have to cut 50% of our annual pollution every  year, or excuse me, every decade. So 50% between  

1:36

now and 2030. Of the remainder, we have to cut  50% of that between 2030 and 2040. And of the  

1:42

remainder of that, we have to cut 50% between  2040 and 2050. getting somewhere between 88 and  

1:48

90% pollution reduction by 2050 overall. At the  same time, we need to be ramping up the capacity  

1:56

for nature and technology to absorb pollution  from the atmosphere. When this gets into balance,  

2:01

when we are able to capture as much pollution  or more as we're putting into the atmosphere,  

2:07

this is something known as net zero. And this is a  term that we're all gonna have to get increasingly  

2:12

familiar with. Anyways, each country sets its own  national goals. They're totally voluntary. And  

2:18

so as a result, there's no way to make these  countries abide by them. And even if we did,  

2:22

that would still put us on a pathway to three  degrees Celsius of warming, which is obviously way  

2:27

past any of the goals. But nonetheless, the Paris  agreement was really essential because it gave  

2:31

the explicit path that regulators and business  people around the world would need to follow.  

2:37

My favorite example is the Glasgow Financial  Alliance for Net Zero. which was a commitment  

2:42

of $130 trillion of assets under management by  big financial institutions around the world.  

2:48

That's 40% of the world's wealth in total. That's  literally the largest number ever uttered in the  

2:52

history of markets. It's just bananas. All  these people committed to investing in a net  

2:57

zero pathway. Another example was the expansion of  the Montreal Protocol around preserving the ozone  

3:03

layer and to start including climate pollutants.  A third example was an international an expansion  

3:09

of the international treaty around aviation to  regulate international aviation emissions. But  

3:15

more recently, it's become less sectoral, less  focused on specific sectors of business and more  

3:19

on just business broadly. In Europe, companies  with over 250 employees are now going to be,  

3:26

are now required to measure, report and reduce  their footprint in the United States. The  

3:32

Securities and Exchange Commission is finalizing  a rule out any day now. that will require every  

3:38

publicly traded company in the United States  to report their emissions. A different law  

3:44

in the state of California is requiring over  5,300 of the largest businesses in that state  

3:50

to report their emissions, including their  supply chains. Federal suppliers are gonna  

3:54

have to start reporting their climate footprint  too. So what does this all mean to you? Well,  

4:00

if your company does business with any of these  regulated businesses or governments, or businesses  

4:05

that do businesses with those businesses or  governments, you're soon going to have to report  

4:10

and reduce your climate footprint. Of course,  we'd love to help you here at Acclimate, but  

4:14

the bigger point that I'm trying to make is that  goals are almost as important as treaties. We'd  

4:19

obviously get to our goals faster if we had a more  binding international agreement, but the wheels of  

4:24

democracy and business are turning. And the goals  that we have are causing action to happen almost  

4:30

everywhere, kind of all at once, in bits and  pieces that are accumulating into like some...  

4:34

really major action. This fragmented approach is  ultimately gonna drive more overarching treaties  

4:39

and regulation, mainly because the biggest  businesses are gonna be screaming for it in order  

4:44

to cut through the tangle of local regulations.  And it's really not a question of if, but when,  

4:49

and the when's not that far off. So keep your  optimism alive. Mine sure is. Follow for more.

English (United States)